← Digital Solutions

Pantau Api / Fire-spread intelligence

Look ahead
of the fire.

Perkirakan arah rambatan api dalam 3, 6, dan 12 jam.

Move from the location of a hotspot to a modelled view of where fire could spread next.

Pantau Api connects satellite detections with environmental conditions to support early warning, situational awareness and response planning for forest and land fires.

Forecast horizonT + 3hoursNear-term view
Forecast horizonT + 6hoursDeveloping scenario
Forecast horizonT + 12hoursExtended outlook

Three time horizons; high, medium and low modelled risk can be assessed within each. Forecasts depend on the inputs and assumptions used.

The problem

A hotspot is a starting point. The next question is direction.

For teams working in peatland landscapes, knowing where heat has been detected is only part of the picture. They also need to consider where a fire may travel as conditions change.

The product's South Sumatra case studies focus on Ogan Komering Ilir and Musi Banyuasin. Its model brings wind, soil moisture, slope and land cover into a common estimate of potential spread.

Industrial activity can also create persistent heat signatures. Distinguishing these signals helps teams review alerts with more context, while keeping possible fire activity under scrutiny.

Inside the application

Start with a shared view of the landscape.

Review hotspots on a map, filter the observation window and satellite source, and examine detection-confidence categories before exploring the modelled outlook.

Pantau Api hotspot monitoring screen for South Sumatra with satellite and time filters, totals and a detection-confidence legend.
Product screenshot supplied by the team. The figures are a captured interface state, not a live incident feed. This view shows hotspots and detection confidence; it does not show the forecast cones. View larger ↗

The modelling perspective

Four factors. One connected estimate.

A deterministic vector model estimates direction and rate of spread. Its lightweight calculation is designed to produce rapid results using the available input data.

01

Wind

Direction and speed shape the projected movement of fire.

02

Soil moisture

Ground conditions inform how readily the landscape may support spread.

03

Slope

Terrain contributes to the model's estimate of the rate of spread.

04

Land cover

Peatland, scrub, oil palm and open land provide different landscape contexts.

From conditions to a spatial outlook

Hotspot + environmental inputs → direction and rate of spread → projected zones at 3, 6 and 12 hours.

Calculation speed and data freshness are different: a fast model still depends on when satellite observations and environmental inputs were collected.

Core capabilities

From detection to a reviewable forecast.

01

Satellite hotspot input

Use NASA FIRMS VIIRS and MODIS detections as the starting point for analysis. A thermal detection identifies a heat anomaly; it does not, by itself, establish the extent of a fire.

02

Deterministic spread modelling

A lightweight mathematical vector model combines wind direction with a rate of spread informed by four environmental factors. It is designed for rapid calculation on a server or in a browser.

03

Three forecast horizons

Project direction and extent at T+3, T+6 and T+12 hours. High, medium and low modelled risk zones provide a spatial view of potential exposure at each horizon.

04

Smooth map geometry

Multi-point spread curves present the projected pattern more naturally on the map, helping users read the direction and reach of the modelled zones.

05

Persistent heat-source screening

The described filter excludes recurring detections present for at least 30 days within an approximately 500-metre radius from alerts. This is a screening rule for potential industrial sources, not confirmation that an area is free of fire.

06

Measurable validation

The validation approach compares modelled areas with satellite reference data using Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice. The stated target is IoU ≥ 0.70; achieved results have not been supplied for publication.

Who it supports

A common picture for preparedness and research.

BPBD & fire-response task forces

Review hotspot signals and potential exposure alongside field reports to inform response planning.

Local government & environmental agencies

Build a shared situational picture across environmental monitoring and preparedness responsibilities.

Plantation & forestry concession holders

Understand modelled exposure around managed landscapes and support coordination with authorized response teams.

Disaster & environmental researchers

Examine model assumptions, compare forecast geometry with reference observations and document validation findings.

Illustrative use cases

Turn a new signal into a better-informed review.

Review a peatland hotspot

A new detection appears in OKI. An analyst examines the six-hour scenario, checks its inputs and considers possible exposure alongside local observations.

Examine a recurring heat source

A detection repeatedly appears near an industrial site. The team reviews the persistence filter and source context before interpreting its alert status.

Test the model against evidence

Researchers compare predicted areas with satellite reference observations, report IoU and Dice, and document where the model performs well or needs refinement.

Validation & interpretation

Make the assumptions as visible as the forecast.

IoU ≥ 0.70 is the stated validation target, not a published performance result.

A useful evaluation should identify the reference data, study area, observation period and performance at each forecast horizon. Dice provides a complementary measure of spatial overlap.

Detection confidence, modelled risk and validation accuracy describe different things. A high-confidence thermal detection does not automatically establish a high-risk spread zone.

Use the outlook alongside current weather, field verification and official incident procedures. Deployment, evacuation and safety decisions remain with the responsible authorities and trained teams; a modelled low-risk area is not a safety guarantee.

Satellite-data context: NASA FIRMS identifies active fire and thermal anomalies, including non-fire heat sources. See NASA's active-fire data caveats. These references describe the input data, not independent validation of Pantau Api.

Explore Pantau Api

Bring your landscape
and monitoring questions.

Discuss the study area, available environmental inputs, forecast views and validation evidence in a product walkthrough.

Request a demonstration